The fundraising fight in the 2026 Wisconsin Supreme Court race is comparatively calm
The 2026 election matchup between Wisconsin Supreme Court candidates Maria Lazar and Chris Taylor is a quieter affair than the state's high court race in 2025, without the spectacle of Elon Musk's involvement, lower levels of interest from other billionaires, and ideological balance not at stake.
Wisconsin Public Radio
March 17, 2026

Wisconsin Court of Appeals Judge Maria Lazar and Wisconsin Court of Appeals Judge Chris Taylor are running in the 2026 election for an open seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court. While a number of outside groups and PACs have gotten involved in the race, donations across the board reflect the lower temperature compared to the state's 2025 election for a high court seat. (Source: Maria Lazar for Supreme Court, Chris Taylor for Justice)

This report was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.
On March 9, the ACLU of Wisconsin announced a nearly half-million dollar ad buy in the upcoming Wisconsin Supreme Court race.
It’s an amount that’s nothing to sneeze at. But compared to the same time in 2025 — when out-of-state billionaires were pouring money into an advertising arms race — it’s a relative drop in the bucket.
Overall, the matchup between Chris Taylor, a liberal Dane County appeals court judge, and Maria Lazar, a conservative Waukesha County appeals court judge, is a quieter affair. That’s reflective of the lower stakes in 2026 compared to 2025.
“The obvious thing that’s missing is that majority control is not up for grabs,” said Anthony Chergosky, a political science professor at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse.
In 2025, Elon Musk flew to Wisconsin to hand out million-dollar checks to voters, arguing that the “course of Western civilization” was in the balance. What he meant was, the ideological balance of the highest court in one of America’s swingiest states was up for grabs.
But a liberal judge — now-Justice Susan Crawford — clinched that race, shoring up liberals’ hold on the court for years to come. The contest between Taylor and Lazar, by contrast, is an effort by conservatives to maintain a relatively competitive minority, and by liberals to cement their majority even further.
In a press release announcing their ad buy, the ACLU and ACLU of Wisconsin said they’d be spending $450,000 on radio and digital ads and mailers sharing where each candidate stands on issues like abortion and voting rights. While not endorsing either candidate, the organizations frame their advocacy as an effort to defend civil liberties.
“As the federal government continues to overstep its authority and undermine core constitutional protections, it is more important than ever that we have a state Supreme Court that will relentlessly defend our rights,” said ACLU of Wisconsin Executive Director Melinda Brennan in a statement.
Still, the advertising push in the campaign’s final four weeks is smaller than similar ACLU ad campaigns in either the 2025 Supreme Court race or the 2023 race between now-Justice Janet Protasiewicz and former Justice Dan Kelly.
And while a number of outside groups and PACs have gotten involved, donations across the board reflect the lower temperature on the 2026 race. Of the top 100 largest gifts made to the Democratic Party of Wisconsin — which backs Taylor, and which is allowed to make unlimited transfers to candidates — only one took place in the 2026 election cycle. That was a donation of $750,000 from the liberal financier George Soros. By comparison, by this time last year, he had given $2 million to the party. Other big names in the Democratic fundraising world, like Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, had not yet donated in this race as of the last fundraising reports.
Likewise, while the Republican Party of Wisconsin backs Lazar, their fundraising game is different than in 2025, too. In the fundraising period that ended on Feb. 17, they reported no fundraising on Lazar’s behalf.
Similarly, big Republican donors, like Diane Hendricks and Richard and Elizabeth Uihlein, have made smaller contributions. Hendricks gave $800,000 to the Republican Party since Lazar entered the race, compared to $3.6 million from January through March 2025, when the GOP was backing conservative judge Brad Schimel’s bid for the Supreme Court.
Taylor’s campaign has substantially outraised Lazar’s, however, with numbers approaching Crawford’s campaign at the same time in 2025. That’s partly because Taylor has been in the race since May, whereas Lazar jumped in in October, after incumbent conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley announced she wouldn’t run again.
Chergovsky, the political scientist, predicts that all these differences will lead to lower turnout than recent April elections.
“The massive amount of cash from donors, the personality factor of Elon, and the idea that majority control was at stake, where this time it’s not … it’s different,” he said.
The next filing deadline for campaign finance reports is March 30. That will give the last major disclosure before voters go to the polls on April 7.
Passport







Follow Us